Football

Final One Standing: Gameweek 29 Predictions

4 hours ago

| BY Ben Dinnery

Options are thinning, and every selection now carries consequences. The midweek slate presents a fascinating blend of momentum swings, defensive trends and misleading projections.

Play Final One Standing at William Hill today

The data offers both clarity and contradiction, so choose wisely…

AFC Bournemouth

Momentum is a powerful thing in football. It shifts narratives, quietens critics and, perhaps most importantly, breeds belief. For Bournemouth, that belief has returned in abundance.

Between Gameweeks 10 and 20, the Cherries endured a bleak spell without a win — a run that threatened to drag their season into mediocrity. But fast forward to March, and the landscape looks very different. Bournemouth are now on their second-longest ever run in the competition – eight Premier League matches – stretching back to early January.

And what has underpinned this resurgence? Defensive resilience.

Six goals conceded in seven matches tells its own story. The structure is better, and the distances between lines are tighter. The Cherries are conceding fewer high-quality chances and, crucially, they are managing phases of the game far more effectively.

But they face a Brentford side who have engineered their own transformation.

For much of the campaign, the Bees have been Jekyll and Hyde — dominant at home, vulnerable on the road. Seven defeats in their opening eight away fixtures painted a clear pattern. However, since then? Five wins in their last six on their travels. That is not variance. That is systemic adjustment.

It means this is not merely a mid-table encounter — it is a meeting of two of the Premier League’s most in-form sides. Brentford rank fourth for points accrued this calendar year – Bournemouth sit sixth – and the form table matters at this stage of the season.

The predictive models slightly favour the hosts (44.6%) — and it’s understandable why. Bournemouth’s defensive output in recent weeks contrasts sharply with Brentford’s. While the Cherries have conceded six in seven, Brentford have allowed 12 across the same period.

When margins tighten, defensive stability often becomes the differentiator. If Bournemouth maintain their recent discipline, they have a platform. This feels tight, but I’m following the data and backing the Cherries.

Everton

There is a curious duality to the Toffees’ recent form. Just two defeats in seven, which includes impressive victories over Newcastle and Aston Villa. Twelve points collected in 2026 — joint ninth best in the division. Yet Everton are winless in six home Premier League matches.

This contradiction speaks of a side that has found competitiveness but not consistency.

Defensively, they have been sound. Eight goals conceded across seven matches reflect a compactness that has been missing at times over the past two seasons. The issue? Attacking fluency. Nine goals scored in that same stretch is modest, particularly when several have arrived from low-probability situations.

Set pieces, however, remain their great leveller.

No Premier League side generates a higher proportion of expected goals from dead-ball situations at home — 36.82% of their total xG. Since September, 64% of their home goals have arrived from set pieces (nine of 14). These are not incidental numbers. From corners and free-kicks, the side is extremely efficient.

Enter… The Clarets!

Over the same recent seven-game window, Burnley have conceded 15 goals and rank joint-worst for expected goals conceded. While they have not been particularly porous, specifically from set pieces, volume matters. This is a match where dead-ball situations could decide everything.

The data models are emphatic — a 63.4% likelihood of a home win — the third-highest of the game week, behind only Liverpool and Manchester City. This feels like an opportunity. And opportunities are hard to come by at this stage of the campaign.

Arsenal

Context shapes perception.

The Gunners sit atop the table, yet recent performances have drawn scrutiny. The football has not always flowed; dominance has not always translated into aesthetic control. And yet, they continue to win.

Brighton, conversely, are enduring turbulence. Back-to-back wins have eased the pressure, but before that, only one victory in twelve led to audible discontent among sections of the support towards head coach Fabian Hurzeler.

The Seagulls have conceded seven in seven, hardly catastrophic, but it does highlight inefficiency at both ends. Only one clean sheet during that run suggests marginal lapses, while only seven goals scored indicate offensive stagnation.

Historically, Arsenal have dominated this fixture. Brighton have won only two of the last 11 meetings, and the Gunners are unbeaten in their last five trips to the Amex. That familiarity breeds psychological advantage.

The individual storyline centres on Viktor Gyokeres.

Derided for much of the season as an underperformer, the striker has quietly shifted his narrative. Five goals in his last six Premier League matches, and six in his last seven away games across all competitions, hint at a striker finding his feet. The volume metrics — shots per 90 and xG per 90 — have not increased dramatically. The difference? Conversion.

For much of the campaign, he underperformed expected goals. Recently, he has exceeded them. There are tactical adjustments, too. Arsenal have adopted a more direct approach at times — longer passes into his channel, earlier deliveries into space. It suits his profile: powerful running combined with an ability to hold off central defenders.

The Seagulls’ defensive organisation suggests Arsenal will not overwhelm them. But if Gyokeres’ upwards finishing trajectory continues, then a single high-quality chance may suffice.

The current league leaders are highly fancied (56.2%), and given their consistency, a controlled, unspectacular away win appears plausible.

Crystal Palace

Sometimes numbers lag behind reality.

The predictive model gives Crystal Palace a 27.3% chance of victory. On the surface, that feels logical — squad depth, resources, historical positioning all favour Tottenham.

But context matters more than raw projection.

Spurs arrive on a four-match losing streak and are winless in 2026. The managerial change has not triggered the hoped-for immediate uplift, and pressure is already mounting on Igor Tudor. While the north London derby loss to Arsenal was understandable, the performance against Fulham on Sunday exposed systemic fragility.

Spurs’ confidence is brittle.

Crystal Palace, under Oliver Glasner, are steadier. Three wins in their last six in all competitions suggest the Eagles are still playing for the soon-to-be-departing Austrian.

London derby data deepens the contrast. Tottenham have lost six of their last seven, while Palace have suffered just one defeat in nine away from Selhurst Park. These are not trivial trends; they reflect temperament.

There is also managerial familiarity. Glasner previously defeated Igor Tudor twice when leading Eintracht Frankfurt. Understanding patterns and structural preferences can subtly influence preparation, but perhaps most telling will be their psychological state.

Palace should arrive with belief. Spurs, on the other hand, are vulnerable, and their opponents sense it.

This may not align with predictive modelling or the historic hierarchy. But football rarely operates solely within those boundaries. Palace will smell an opportunity here.