WWE
Clash in Italy – Brock Lesnar vs Oba Femi Predictions
Brock Lesnar vs Oba Femi at WWE Clash in Italy should be all about consolidating Femi as a genuine main‑event star in the eyes of William Hill News, not rewriting the emotional finish from WrestleMania 42.
Lesnar already did the honours on the biggest stage, and anything that drags him back to parity risks diluting what that first win meant for Femi.
Prediction
Even if the temptation is there to give Lesnar the win and drag things to a trilogy, that would be a short‑term pop at the expense of Femi’s long‑term momentum. The cleanest, most logical outcome – and the one that preserves the value of WrestleMania 42 – is Oba Femi beating Brock Lesnar again in Italy.
Expect a more chaotic, weapon‑heavy brawl than their first match, plenty of smoke and mirrors to protect Brock’s aura, and a decisive closing stretch where Femi absorbs the best Lesnar has left and still puts him down.
Oba Femi to win, keeping his record over Lesnar perfect and finally closing the book on The Beast’s era instead of reopening it for a forced trilogy.
Why the rematch feels wrong
WrestleMania 42 told a clear, satisfying story. Oba Femi beat The Beast straight up, and Lesnar leaving his boots and gloves in the ring was a classic retirement visual that doubled as a passing‑of‑the‑torch moment.
That scene turned him de facto babyface and gave fans permission to appreciate his legacy on the way out.
Walking that back for Clash in Italy – especially under the “biggest rematch in pro wrestling history” tagline – undercuts both the emotion of the retirement tease and the significance of Femi’s Mania win.
It also flips the alignment in a jarring way: Femi was already over as a babyface, and now he’s being asked to work against a suddenly heel Lesnar whose goodbye was, retroactively, just an angle.
From a long‑term booking perspective, that is dangerous. If Lesnar simply steamrolls Femi to “get his win back”, it reframes Mania as a fluke and tells fans not to invest too heavily in future coronations, because they can be undone by the next stadium show.
What should happen
The priority here should be cementing Femi, not rehabbing Lesnar. That means:
- Femi proves the Mania win wasn’t a one‑off by surviving Lesnar’s early onslaught and adapting to the veteran’s shortcuts.
- Lesnar leans into the bitter, spiteful heel act – cheap shots, post‑match attacks – so the story becomes about a legend unable to accept that someone new can beat him twice.
- Femi wins again, ideally decisively enough that a “rubber match” doesn’t feel necessary, or at worst with an emphatic visual after a competitive war.
Handled right, a second straight victory over a fully heel, fully desperate Beast does more for Femi’s stock than the first one did. It tells the audience this is his era now, and that WWE is serious about building a new monster at the top of the card.
